A tale of direct listings: learnings from Palantir, Asana, and more

Off the heels of major tech companies taking the DPO route for their public listings (i.e. Slack and Spotify), two more direct listings hit the public markets in September and made waves. Palantir and Asana both made their public debuts the last week of September, and both decided to go with a direct listing or DPO.

Direct listings offer reduced hype cycles, less volatility, cost-effective methods that cut out underwriters, and usually, the ability to avoid lockups. They benefit shareholders and employees overall, but performance has been mixed, and many are curious about how DPOs fare against their IPO counterparts.

When Palantir filed its S1, it was a significant moment for its employees, shareholders and for everyone who was awaiting the tech giant’s public debut for 17 years. Palantir’s debut was also a major moment for the private markets given the trading of the tech giant’s shares were an early indication of the insights one could potentially glean from a marketplace like Forge. In the case of Palantir’s direct listing, the reference price was squarely in the middle of what investors in the private markets were paying for the stock in the lead up to the debut. This was an indication that the price of the stock was set at not only an expected value but one that represented the reality of what it was worth. By the end of day-one trading, Palantir closed within 10% of its reference price showing it was a fair value for the company and its investors.

Now, when we look at Asana, we saw a similarly anticipated Silicon Valley unicorn take the direct listing route for its public debut, with a reference price of $21 and an opening day price of $27. In the month leading up to Asana’s public debut, the company reported in its SEC filing that shares traded between $14.24 to $28 a share, with a volume-weighted average price of $25.11, right in the middle of it’s reference price and it’s opening day price – indicating a spot on value for its shareholders.

Before this year, the two previous monumental tech direct listings, Slack (in 2019) and Spotify (in 2018) both saw first-day gains and used a reference price method, based on where shares were trading in the secondary markets in the lead up to their public debut, to set their reference points. Slack, the online communications tool, soared 49% from its initial reference price of $26, which matched the pricing of the stock in the private markets, to close at $38.62. Online music provider, Spotify, which also used the reference price method, entered its debut day with a price reflective of the trading the stock experienced on the secondary market. In 2018, Spotify shares traded on the private markets between $90 and $132.50, informing the company's reference price of $132, before it hit its opening trade of $165.90 or a 25% increase.

When you look at these results and compare them to a recent tech software stock debut from Snowflake, there’s a clear juxtaposition in the delta of the reference price and the opening day price. As an IPO, Snowflake opened its public debut with a reference price of $120, and by the open of its first day of trading, it experienced a 104% surge up to $245, which may look like a great success, but actually indicates a missed opportunity in proper pricing. In the case of Snowflake, it was underpriced.

So which of these exits were successful? When it comes to direct listings and public debuts, what we’ve seen is that success should be defined by the value a stock provides its shareholders and a price that is well informed by data. Performance as indicated by private markets can drive that value, and by offering insights that companies should want to leverage, it can save them and their investors from a position where they may miss out because a stock is underpriced, as is the case with Snowflake, or truly drive a fair value for their shareholders, as exhibited by Palantir.

At Forge, we help companies and investors better understand trends and pricing so they can make decisions that benefit them.

Please Read These Important Legal Notices & Disclosures

The information and material presented in this article is provided for your informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer by Forge Global, Inc., Forge Securities LLC or any of its affiliates (collectively, "Forge") to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities and may not be used or relied upon in connection with any offer or sale of securities. An offer or solicitation can be made only through the delivery of final offering document(s) and purchase agreement and will be subject to the terms and conditions and risks delivered in such documents.

To the extent information about or defining specific terms is provided herein, Forge makes no representations as to its accuracy and has no duty to update such information. Such information is based on Forge’s experience and the meanings and connotations of terms as Forge typically uses and interprets them. Others may construe such terms differently, and you should do your own research and consult with financial, legal and tax professionals regarding any such concepts included herein.

This article does not constitute an offer to provide investment advice or service. Registered representatives of Forge Securities LLC do not (1) advise any member on the merits or prudence of a particular investment or transaction, or (2) assist in the determination of fair value of any security or investment, or (3) provide legal, tax, or transactional advisory services. Securities referenced in this article may be offered by Forge Securities LLC, member FINRA/SIPC.

Forge Securities LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Forge Global, Inc. Certain affiliates may act as principals in such transactions. Forge Data LLC is an affiliate of Forge Global, Inc. and Forge Securities LLC.

Investing in private company securities is not suitable for all investors. An investment in private company securities is highly speculative, involving a high degree of risk, and investors should be prepared to withstand a total loss of your investment. Private company securities are also highly illiquid and there is no guarantee that a market will develop for such securities. Each investment also carries its own specific risks and investors should conduct their own, independent due diligence regarding the investment, including obtaining additional information about the company, opinions, financial projections and legal or investment advice. Accordingly, investing in private company securities is appropriate only for those investors who can tolerate a high degree of risk and do not require a liquid investment. Past performance Is not indicative of future results.